Writing presentations can be quite enlightening, since you ideally should know what you're talking about. Granted, I think it's easier to talk to non-specialists because then you can get away with more handwaving, but sometimes, when you want to explain stuff in the most basic way possible, it requires you to think things through - what's really going on in this process I'm trying to describe? How can it be explained in plain words?
There are some of things I loathe when it comes to listening to a presentation:
- Slides containing walls of text
![]() |
Like this |
- When the slides are exact copies of the speaker's manuscript
- When the speaker provides too little background. I would rather hear things one time too many than one time too little.
- I view slides not as the main conveyors of information, but rather as a tool to complement what I say. What I say is the most important thing in a presentation - not what's on the slides.
- I try to illustrate my points with pictures when possible - it's much easier to grasp and you don't have to read while the presenter is talking
- When I have to resort to text, I try to keep it as short and simple as possible. The slides provide cues for what I will say, but they're only cues, not manuscripts.
- I try (time permitting) to provide as much background as the listeners need to understand what I'm talking about.
As for choosing the style of your slides: sometimes I think certain slide styles can look cool, but elaborate slide designs can sometimes take focus away from what you're saying. I use the Latex beamer class with just a very clean setup for my presentations.